How Kentucky Is Keeping Kids Out of Court

This video is hosted by YouTube. In order to view it, you must consent to the use of “Marketing Cookies” by updating your preferences in the Cookie Settings link below. View on YouTube

This video is hosted by YouTube. In order to view it, you must consent to the use of “Marketing Cookies” by updating your preferences in the Cookie Settings link below. View on YouTube

Kentucky’s youth diversion program has helped children across the commonwealth stay out of court and remain with their families while improving public safety and saving taxpayer dollars—showing that investing in communities over courts benefits everyone. What’s more, Kentucky’s approach has drastically reduced the number of Black youths within their system, which allows courts to intentionally focus on the pervasive racial and ethnic disparities that persist within the system today.

"The changes involved do good for the children involved and can change the path of your state for the better," Kentucky state Senator Whitney Westerfield (R) shares in an interview with The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Watch the full video to learn more about this model and how the following leaders are addressing the racial and ethnic disparities within their state's juvenile justice system: Pastor Edward L. Palmer Sr., District Court Judge John Lindsey Adams, Sen. Westerfield, and director of the Office of Statewide Programs Rachel Bingham.

Learn more about how to improve the juvenile legal system.

Sending Kids to Court Doesn't Help Them. Here’s What Will.
Sending Kids to Court Doesn't Help Them. Here’s What Will.
Video

Sending Kids to Court Doesn't Help Them. Here's What Will.

Quick View
Video

In this video, experts explain how the current system is failing our kids and how diverting them from courts—which can range from community service to writing a letter of apology—can hold kids accountable without upending their lives.

Window
Article

How State Reform Efforts Are Transforming Juvenile Justice

Quick View
Article

Since 2012, a growing number of states have used data and research to inform sweeping policy changes that aim to improve juvenile justice systems. Their efforts include prioritizing use of detention and out-of-home placement for youth who present the greatest public safety risk, limiting the length of their confinement, reinvesting taxpayer savings to expand access to evidence-based services, and supporting community-based interventions for lower-level offenses.