Assessment of Nontraditional Products in Development to Combat Bacterial Infections, September 2019

Because the conventional antibiotics pipeline remains so thin, finding new approaches is critical

Navigate to:

Assessment of Nontraditional Products in Development to Combat Bacterial Infections, September 2019

This brief is no longer up-to-date. See the latest data here.

While antibiotic innovation—finding and designing new types of antibiotics and improving existing drugs—remains essential to combating antibiotic resistance, “outside-the-box” approaches to preventing and treating bacterial infections are also needed. Such nontraditional approaches encompass a variety of products, including:

  • Well-known medical interventions, such as vaccines and immunotherapies, that have been proved effective in treating other types of disease and may also hold promise for the prevention or treatment of systemic (throughout the body) bacterial infections.
  • Entirely new types of therapies that have never been approved for use in human medicine. For example, products that disarm harmful pathogens to neutralize their threat to patients, or products that replace harmful bacteria with “healthy” bacteria to alleviate disease.

Nontraditional products are unlikely to fully substitute or replace antibiotic use but could provide new treatment options for patients through combined use with antibiotics or as a means of preventing an infection from taking hold. Questions remain regarding how nontraditional products should be tested for safety and efficacy, and how they could be used appropriately in the clinical setting.

To shed light on the development of these types of products and evaluate public policies to spur innovation, The Pew Charitable Trusts assessed nontraditional products for the treatment of systemic bacterial infection in clinical testing. The list, which will be updated regularly, identifies each product and its manufacturer, type of approach, potential targets, and stage in the clinical development process. The list does not include products that are in development but not yet being tested in humans. (See the methodology below for the criteria used to select the nontraditional products.)

Findings

The current assessment of the nontraditional pipeline shows that 29 candidates are in clinical development. Unlike many antibiotics in development, most nontraditional products are active against a limited range of pathogens. As of June 2019:

  • Of the 29 nontraditional products in development, five were in Phase 1 clinical trials, 17 in Phase 2, and seven in Phase 3. (See the glossary of terms for descriptions of each phase.)
  •  More than half of the nontraditional products in development are vaccines or antibodies. The remaining candidates include lysins, live biotherapeutic products, and peptide immunomodulators.
  • Over half of the nontraditional products in development are for the treatment of  Clostridioides difficile (an organism associated with serious, sometimes life-threatening diarrhea) or Staphylococcus aureus (associated with skin and a variety of systemic infections). 
  • Just over a third of the nontraditional products in development are being pursued by firms in the top 50 pharmaceutical companies by sales revenue. These firms are primarily developing vaccines or antibodies.

Harnessing the promise of nontraditional products requires focused attention from a broad range of stakeholders, including scientists, clinicians, funders, and regulators to support:

  • Targeted research and development to evaluate whether a given nontraditional approach is effective.
  • Demonstrated improvement over antibiotic treatment alone.
  • Establishment of regulatory guidelines for approval of innovative products.

Methodology

An initial list of nontraditional products in clinical development was provided by Citeline Inc.’s Pharmaprojects pipeline drug intelligence service.

The pipeline includes nontraditional products intended to treat or prevent serious infections that act systemically but excludes locally acting drugs such as topical, ophthalmic, and inhaled products. It does not include new indications or different formulations of previously approved products, or products used to treat Helicobacter pylori, biothreat pathogens, or mycobacterial infections such as tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium complex.

Also included in the pipeline are products targeting C. difficile infections, many of which act locally in the intestines. C. difficile is often the consequence of systemic antibiotic use, and, while these bacteria are not yet widely resistant to antibiotics, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention considers this pathogen an urgent threat. Thousands of Americans contract the illness each year, and an estimated 15,000 die as a result.

Pew supplemented the data provided by Citeline with other public information—specifically, trials registered in clinicaltrials.gov, articles published in the scientific literature or trade press, and company communications. Pew also works with external experts who advise on selection criteria and accuracy of information. This pipeline focuses on drug candidates under development for the U.S. market.

This pipeline will be updated biannually, beginning in March 2017. To submit additions, updates, or comments, please contact [email protected].

Antibiotic Development
Antibiotic Development

Tracking the Pipeline of Antibiotics in Development

Quick View

This collection page was updated in December 2017 with new content. Drug-resistant bacteria, or superbugs, present a serious and worsening threat to human health. A majority of doctors have encountered patients with infections that do not respond to available treatments, and when new drugs come to market bacteria can quickly develop resistance. According to a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2 million Americans acquire serious infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria each year, and at least 23,000 die as a result. A sustained and robust pipeline of new antibacterial drugs and novel therapies is critical to ensure that new interventions keep pace with these evolving pathogens.