Economic Development Incentives Evaluation Toolkit

Resources to help state and local officials measure and increase effectiveness

Economic Development Incentives Evaluation Toolkit

Tax incentives are one of the primary tools that states use to strengthen their economies. But these incentive programs also collectively cost states billions of dollars each year. For more than 10 years beginning in 2012, The Pew Charitable Trusts analyzed states’ policies and practices to provide insights into the costs and returns of these incentives. Over that span, the number of states that evaluate the effectiveness of their incentives increased dramatically, as did the amount of data, analysis, and technical capacity available to conduct evaluations.

This toolkit offers an array of resources—reports, webinars, technical assistance memos, testimonies to state legislatures, and presentations from a decade of research and analysis—to help policymakers, researchers, and the public better understand the impact of economic development incentives in their states.

Every state is different; so is every incentive program and evaluation process. However, Pew has found that many lessons and best practices are broadly applicable. The materials in the toolkit are categorized by the state or locality studied and by subject matter, with each resource addressing a specific element of incentive evaluation and improvement. Although some of the content may be dated, particularly in the older documents, that material nevertheless provides important context on the evolution of tax incentive evaluation efforts around the country.

In addition, Pew provided funding to the National Conference of State Legislatures to catalog state tax incentive evaluations dating back to 2008 in a publicly available State Tax Incentive Evaluations Database.

Please find a glossary of terms at the bottom of this page.

Filters

For Policymakers
For Evaluators
Results: 1 - 10 of 98
Date

Evaluator Roundtable Highlights Include Data Source Methods and ‘Second-Time’ Strategies

Expert summarizes the 9th annual tax incentives conference

Published: December 15, 2023

In this summary, originally published by The Pew Charitable Trusts in December 2023, Jim Landers, associate professor of clinical public affairs and Enarson fellow, John Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University, shares the highlights from the ninth annual Roundtable on Evaluating Economic Development Tax Incentives... Read more

Format: Analysis

How Survey Methods Can Support Tax Incentive Evaluations

Expert shares examples from states

Published: October 16, 2023

In this column, originally published by The Pew Charitable Trusts in October 2023, Jim Landers, associate professor of clinical public affairs and Enarson fellow, John Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University, uses state examples to show how survey analysis can provide efficient and effective methods for collecting... Read more

Format: Analysis

Keys to Creating an Effective Tax Incentive Evaluation Process

Published: June 11, 2023

In a June 11, 2023, article, Ellen D. Harpel of Smart Incentives discussed lessons from several years of observations of Oklahoma’s high-quality incentive evaluations.

Format: Analysis

New Benefit-Cost Model Can Help States Boost Economic Development

Published: May 16, 2023

On May 16, 2023, The Pew Charitable Trusts hosted a webinar in partnership with Dr. Timothy J. Bartik from the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research to discuss Bartik’s updated model for assessing the effectiveness of economic development incentives. The model incorporates trade-offs and accounts for key facts, including... Read more

Format: Webinar

Approaches for Designing Job Creation Tax Incentives

Pew responds to questions from the Philadelphia Department of Commerce

Published: February 21, 2023

On Feb. 21, 2023, The Pew Charitable Trusts submitted a memo to the Philadelphia Department of Commerce in response to the agency’s questions about the city’s job creation program, including how to evaluate it, manage undersubscription and oversubscription, connect it to workforce objectives, create metrics to score applicants,... Read more

Format: Memo

What Is Most Important When Evaluating Tax Incentive Programs?

Evaluation expert discusses the fundamentals of effective practice

Published: February 1, 2023

In this essay, Jim Landers, associate professor of clinical public affairs and Enarson fellow, John Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University, describes takeaways from the 2022 National Conference of State Legislatures/The Pew Charitable Trusts Roundtable on Evaluating Economic Development Tax Incentives. The... Read more

Format: Analysis

A Review of Tax Incentive Evaluation Processes Across the U.S.

Expert offers look at national tax incentive evaluation trends

Published: August 11, 2022

On August 11, 2022, The Pew Charitable Trusts presented to the Tax Expenditure Review Commission of Minnesota on the state of tax incentive evaluation across the United States. John Hamman’s presentation covered:

  • Why evaluate tax incentives?
  • Evaluation in the states
  • Incentive evaluation best practices
  • Connecting evaluation... Read more

Format: PowerPoint

Why Understanding Who Benefits From Incentive Programs Is Important

One evaluator discusses what states need to know

Published: August 1, 2022

This column by Jim Landers, associate professor of clinical public affairs and Enarson fellow, John Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University, examines how evaluators can better understand who benefits from incentives to help determine whether targeted incentives are achieving their goals; reaching intended... Read more

Format: Analysis

Evaluations Can Help Policymakers Balance Risk and Reward of Tax Incentives

Pew shares with Alabama legislative staff research on best practices for tax incentives

Published: May 2, 2022

In a May 2 memo to the Alabama Legislative Services Agency, Fiscal Division, Pew staff members share resources and examples from states that highlight how commissions and study committees can use findings from tax incentive evaluations to inform policy decisions and improve incentive effectiveness. The memo also details options... Read more

Format: Memo

How Indiana’s Process Can Inform Tax Incentive Evaluation Planning

An expert reviews strategy from a leading state

Published: April 1, 2022

In an essay published in April 2022, Jim Landers, associate professor of clinical public affairs and Enarson fellow, John Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University, summarized key lessons learned from Indiana’s experience planning tax incentive evaluations. Landers explains that ensuring evaluations provide... Read more

Format: Analysis

Glossary

Economic development incentives. Financial investments that collectively are a primary tool states use to try to change business behavior, such as encouraging businesses to create jobs, relocate, invest in equipment and facilities, or engage in other economically beneficial actions.

  • Tax incentives. Credits, exemptions, and deductions.
  • Cash incentives. Direct payments in the form of grants or loans to businesses.
  • Discretionary incentives. Programs that grant administrators leeway to decide which applicants receive awards based on predetermined parameters and that require businesses to meet various performance standards.
  • By-right incentives. Codified programs in which any business that meets the requirements is eligible to receive an award.

But for. Business-generated economic activity that would not have occurred without a given incentive provided by the state.

Displacement. Economic activity spurred by a tax incentive that comes at the expense of other businesses in the state.

Economic modeling. Tools, typically based on a series of equations that represent economic relationships, that evaluators use to measure the economic impact of tax incentives, for instance, how the introduction of an incentive in one sector affects other areas of the economy. Examples include REMI (Regional Economic Models, Inc.) or IMPLAN (impact analysis for planning).

Fiscal challenges. Quick and unexpected increases in the cost of incentives that cause problems for state budgets.

Incentive administration. State agency or agencies responsible for operating tax incentive programs, which, depending on the specifics, may include advertising, eligibility determinations, or performance monitoring.

Incentive data. Information about tax incentive programs that states gather from a variety of sources including revenue departments, workforce agencies, and businesses themselves.

Incentive design. The features of a program, including which companies are eligible, the size of benefits, and the type of benefits (whether tax breaks, grants, or loans), which largely drive the returns states realize.

Leakage. Benefits of incentive-driven economic activity in a state that flow to other states, such as when a manufacturer locates in a state to take advantage of an incentive but buys supplies from a company in a neighboring state, boosting revenue and jobs there.

Multiplier effect. The additional economic activity that cascades from a change in business activity, such as when a company invests or expands, creating jobs, and those newly hired workers then spend their wages on goods and services, producing yet more jobs.

  • Multiplier. A measure of the magnitude of additional economic impacts generated by a change in business activity.

Opportunity costs. Lost benefits in certain spending areas, such as education, transportation, or broad-based tax cuts, resulting from dedicating funds to an incentive that the state might otherwise have invested in those priorities.

Regression analysis. Models that estimate the relationship between a single independent variable and one or more dependent variables.

Counterfactual statistical analysis. An attempt to estimate outcomes under a set of circumstances other than those observed in the real world, such as under a different set of policies, which is then compared to observed actual outcomes to gauge a program or policy’s causal impact.

Difference-in-differences analysis. A statistical technique used to study a new policy or program’s effect by comparing outcomes over time between a treatment group that experiences that policy or program and a control group that does not.

Interrupted time series analysis. A statistical technique that measures an incentive’s impact by looking at outcomes over a given period before and after its implementation.

Panel data analysis. A statistical method of assessing change in a set of businesses or individuals along the same characteristics, such as employment or revenue, over time.

Propensity score matching. A statistical technique that compares outcomes for each observed person or business that was subjected to a policy or intervention with those for a similar person or business that was not, using the latter like the control group in a controlled experiment.

Simulation analysis. A method that involves creating a model of how businesses or individuals respond to various economic factors and then using it to simulate outcomes under various incentive policies and draw conclusions or make predictions about a given policy’s impact.

Synthetic control method. A statistical technique that assigns weights to and combines multiple units, such as states or cities, that are not exposed to a policy change into a synthetic control group that, in combination, is comparable to the study unit that has been subjected to the change.

Street map art, three prints in blue, white and black
Street map art, three prints in blue, white and black
Report

States Can Direct Economic Development to Places in Need

Quick View
Report

Data from an array of sources has shown that Americans who grow up in economically distressed areas experience lower-performing schools, higher crime rates, a variety of health and environmental hazards, and less upward mobility.

Portrait of a young girl in a private school uniform doing homework at the kitchen table.
Portrait of a young girl in a private school uniform doing homework at the kitchen table.
Article

States Need to Know Who Benefits From Tax Incentives

Quick View
Article

Pennsylvania spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on tax credits designed to expand educational options for the state’s children by helping to defray the cost of attending private schools for students from low- or middle-income households or those who live in areas with poorly performing schools.

Budget Threads

Pew’s read on the latest state fiscal news

Quick View

In this regular feature, experts from The Pew Charitable Trusts highlight and add context to economic and policy developments and their implications for states’ budgets and long-term fiscal sustainability.