Data Visualization

Tax Revenue Trends

Fiscal 50

Read time:

The tax revenue trends indicator measures the difference between recent state tax collections and their 15-year trend levels, after adjusting for inflation and seasonality. This approach provides a window into how current conditions compare with a state's long-term trajectory over the previous 15 years and may paint a different picture than recent state forecasts and relatively volatile quarterly and annual percentage changes. A deeper understanding of long-term trends can help state leaders judge whether their budgets are on a sustainable path and allow for better-informed fiscal planning and policy formulation.

Updated: September 3, 2024

Tax Revenue Underperforms Long-Term Trends in Most States

At the end of 2023, tax revenue was below long-term trends nationally and in 28 states, the most since the second quarter of 2014 when states were still recovering from the 2007-09 Great Recession. The count of states underperforming their 15-year trajectories has steadily increased in recent quarters as collections have declined from the unexpectedly high levels they reached during the second and third budget years of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Nationally, tax revenue was 3.2% below its 15-year trend, after adjusting for inflation and smoothing for seasonal fluctuations. By contrast, at their peak in the second quarter of 2022, actual tax revenue collections were 14.9% above trend—greater than at any point in at least 15 years. The recent declines from pandemic highs largely reflect a return to growth rates more aligned with historical averages. Though most past revenue declines of similar magnitudes have coincided with recessions, the current trend is primarily due to waning temporary pandemic factors and widespread tax cuts.

And although many states anticipated the revenue slowdown, the declines nevertheless highlight growing fiscal challenges. As the nation moves past its brief but extraordinary period of widespread surpluses and historic revenue growth, policymakers will likely have less new money to fund policy priorities such as tax cuts, increased funding for public services, and recession preparedness.

The states that were the furthest below their long-term trends were California (13.9% below trend), Connecticut (8.2% below), and Minnesota (8.1% below). California’s and Connecticut’s deviations can be explained, in part, by a poor stock market performance in 2022. A substantial slowdown in initial public offerings also lowered collections in California. By contrast, a major factor influencing Minnesota’s performance was the implementation in fiscal year 2024 of one of the largest tax cuts (by dollar amount) across the states.

Despite the collective dip below trend, in nearly half of states, tax revenue levels remained above their 15-year trajectories, reflecting their relative overall strength and the scale of the pandemic highs from which collections have descended. Even so, in most of these above-trend states, revenue declined during the fourth quarter of 2024.

In total, 37 states reported lower year-over-year inflation-adjusted tax revenue in the fourth quarter of 2023, with declines ranging from 41.3% in Alaska and 20.9% in Wyoming to less than 1% in Indiana and Michigan. Alaska’s and Wyoming’s declines were driven by falling energy prices, which weakened severance tax collections—these energy-rich states’ largest and second-largest tax revenue source, respectively.

Nationally, state tax revenue rose 1.8% in the fourth quarter of 2023, ending a five-quarter streak of declines. But these gains can largely be attributed to a temporary shift in California’s income tax filing deadline. Excluding California, state tax collections continued to fall.

As a result, the fourth quarter saw an increasing number of states underperforming their long-term trends. At the end of the third quarter of 2022, tax collections in all 50 states were performing above their 15-year trends, but the number performing below their trends grew rapidly after that, starting with just one state at the end of 2022, rising to four by the end of the first quarter of 2023, then 17 by the end of the second quarter of 2023, and finally reaching 28 in the fourth quarter.

State highlights

A comparison of tax revenue in the fourth quarter of 2023 and each state’s 15-year trend levels, adjusted for inflation and seasonality, shows that:

  • Tax revenue outperformed its long-term trend in 22 states. Alaska led all states by far—collecting more than triple (225.2%) its long-term trend level. The states with the next-highest collections compared with their long-term trends were Wyoming (24.8% above trend), New Mexico (20.8% above), Montana (5.6% above), and Nevada (4.9% above).
  • The states with the weakest tax revenue compared with their long-term trends were California (13.9% below trend), Connecticut (8.2% below), Minnesota (8.1% below), Iowa (6.0% below), New York (5.6% below), and Arkansas (5.2% below). In California, New York, and Connecticut, revenue is strongly tied to the stock market, which suppressed collections in 2023 because of weak performance the year before. Arkansas, Iowa, and Minnesota all recently implemented significant tax cuts.
  • The number of states performing below their long-term revenue trends rose to 28 from 18 in the third quarter of 2023. The 11 new states were Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and Virginia. Nebraska climbed back above its long-term trajectory.

Approximately 75% of total state tax revenue comes via levies on personal income, general sales of goods and services, and corporate income. During the fourth quarter of 2023, general sales and corporate income taxes outperformed their 15-year trends while personal income taxes underperformed.

  • For the 43 states that impose a personal income tax, those collections were 12.4%, or $18 billion, below their 15-year trend as of the fourth quarter of 2023, after adjusting for inflation and seasonality.
    • However, just 41 states collect broad-based personal income taxes, and of those:
      • 33 had collections that underperformed long-term trends, ranging from 37.4% below trend in Arizona and 27.8% below in Arkansas to less than 0.1% below in Indiana.
      • Personal income tax revenue outperformed its long-term trend by the greatest amount in New Mexico (6.6%).
    • New Hampshire taxes only specific personal dividend and interest income. Tennessee had a tax similar to New Hampshire’s until fiscal 2020, but that tax was fully phased out on Jan. 1, 2021, although the state still reports some lingering collections.
  • Corporate income tax collections were 19%, or $5 billion, higher than their 15-year trend as of the fourth quarter of 2023. Historically, corporate income taxes are more volatile than other major state taxes. Of the 46 states that impose this tax type:
    • 42 had collections that outperformed long-term trends, ranging from 226.4% above trend in Alaska to 0.7% above in Minnesota.
    • Corporate income tax revenue underperformed its long-term trend in Indiana (6.8% below trend), Iowa (2% below), Connecticut (1.8% below), and New Jersey (0.8% below).
  • General sales tax collections were 2.2%, or $2.5 billion, higher than their 15-year trend as of the fourth quarter of 2023. Of the 45 states that impose this tax type:
    • 34 had collections that outperformed long-term trends, ranging from 13.3% above trend in Wyoming to less than a tenth of a percent above in Pennsylvania (0.08%) and Colorado (0.04%).
    • General sales tax revenue underperformed its long-term trend in 11 states: Louisiana (5.2% below trend), Virginia (4.9% below), Ohio (3.2% below), Kansas (2.4% below), Washington (2.2% below), North Carolina (1.1% below), Nevada (0.9% below), Illinois (0.7% below), Minnesota (0.6% below), California (0.1% below), and Massachusetts (0.1% below).

Recent developments

State tax collections have been on a downward trajectory since their mid-2022 peak, reflecting, in large part, a decline from the unexpected highs of the pandemic revenue wave.

Monthly data from the Urban Institute shows that total inflation-adjusted tax collections remained stagnant nationwide through the first five months of calendar year 2024. And fiscal year-to-date collections through May 2024 were down $2.6 billion (0.2%) compared with the same period a year earlier. The decline would have been steeper had it not been for California’s double-digit increase during the period, which strongly boosted collections nationwide. In fact, nearly four-fifths of states were running behind 2023 levels during the first 11 months of fiscal 2024.

Yet despite the stagnation, many states outperformed their revenue forecasts. According to the National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO), 33 states reported being on track to collect more revenue during fiscal 2024 than they initially projected. States’ fiscal 2024 budgets anticipated a nominal 1.8% annual decline in general fund revenue amid slowing economic growth and the waning of the temporary factors that drove the fiscal 2021 and 2022 revenue surge, primarily the indirect effects of federal aid to businesses and individuals, a shift in consumer spending patterns, and record-breaking stock market gains. The recent weakening in revenue growth largely reflects the unwinding of these factors and a return to more normal conditions following the brief boom.

One question is whether states will be able to afford the budgetary commitments they made in the past three years—such as tax relief and pay raises for public employees—over the long term. For instance, fiscal 2023 and 2024 saw the largest net state tax cuts ever recorded (by dollar amount), according to NASBO. These reductions range from targeted, temporary rebates to permanent, broad-based rate reductions. Additionally, lawmakers in 40 states approved across-the-board wage increases for state employees in fiscal 2024, ranging from 2% to 12%, an increase from the 37 states that raised state worker wages in fiscal 2023 and the 25 states that did so in fiscal 2022.

States can use two fiscal management tools to better evaluate whether they will be able to afford these and other commitments over the long term and to prepare for possible future fiscal challenges:

  • Long-term budget assessments help policymakers identify challenges that can build over time.
  • Budget stress tests help leaders assess how different economic scenarios would affect their budgets and how much to set aside in their rainy day funds.

Changes since the pandemic’s onset

The start of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 abruptly ended a nearly continual stretch of annual growth since 2010 when state tax revenue began recovering from the Great Recession. Aggregate state tax revenue from April through June 2020 was an extraordinary 25.3% lower than in the same quarter of 2019—the steepest single-quarter plunge in at least 25 years.

But much of the sudden shortfall resulted from the federal government’s decision—copied by nearly all states—to delay that year’s income tax filing deadline until July 15, which pushed large sums of personal and corporate income tax payments into the first quarter of fiscal 2021 and aggravated the strain on many states’ fiscal 2020 budgets. In the face of tremendous uncertainty, states forecasted multiyear revenue declines comparable to or more severe than those experienced as a result of the 2007-09 recession. But as the pandemic progressed, national tax revenue rebounded swiftly by historical standards—recovering about five times faster than it did after the 2007-09 recession.

Tax collections continued to exceed expectations in budget years 2021 and 2022, posting the highest and second-highest annual growth rates of the past 25 years, respectively, and bringing state tax revenue to record highs, while historic rainy day fund balances and federal aid to state governments gave state budgets extra breathing room.

Of the various factors that contributed to these higher-than-expected collections, unprecedented federal aid to businesses and unemployed workers, a shift in consumer spending patterns from purchases of often-untaxed services to typically taxable goods, and widespread conservative revenue forecasts were the primary catalysts. States’ relatively recent authority to collect sales taxes from out-of-state online sellers, quicker-than-anticipated recoveries in the stock market and employment, and job stability in higher-wage professions that were able to pivot to remote work also played a significant role.

Natural resource-dependent states—such as Alaska, North Dakota, and Wyoming—and those reliant on tourism—such as Hawaii and Nevada—had some of the deepest and longest-running declines in tax revenue. Reduced travel in the early stages of the pandemic hurt businesses and jobs in the leisure and hospitality industries and lowered demand for fuel, further depressing tax revenue in energy states that were already coping with pre-pandemic declines in oil and gas prices. Starting in the second half of 2021, however, rising energy prices and increasing tourism have boosted these states’ recoveries.

The years of momentous tax revenue growth came to an end in fiscal 2023, when inflation-adjusted tax revenue fell compared with the prior year—the only time in at least 40 years that real annual tax revenue has declined outside of a recession.

Why Pew assesses state tax revenue trends

Tax revenue serves as the primary source of funding for most states. By tracking tax revenue trends, Pew provides policymakers and analysts with insights into the long-term financial health of their states, because revenue directly affects states' capacity to provide residents with core public services—such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure—and to fund other policy priorities.

Understanding long-term trends can also help state leaders judge whether their budgets are on a sustainable path and can support better-informed fiscal planning and policy formulation. Policymakers should assess the factors behind tax revenue deviations from long-term trends—overall and for particular revenue streams—to understand whether revenue variations stem from policy changes, external factors beyond their immediate control—such as demographic shifts—or both. And to help ensure their state’s long-term fiscal sustainability, lawmakers should also examine whether these deviations are the result of one-time or temporary factors or whether they represent a more structural change that is likely to persist without policy action.

Justin Theal is a senior officer and Alexandre Fall is a senior associate with The Pew Charitable Trusts’ Fiscal 50 project.

Notes

Notes, Sources & Methodology
Notes

Note that quarters are labeled by calendar, not fiscal, year.

The data includes the revenue effects of legislative tax changes, so revenue trends may not be attributable solely to economic conditions, such as changes in employment, personal income, and population, or to stock market performance. For example, policymakers in Tennessee chose to fully phase out the state’s personal income tax as of Jan. 1, 2021, leading to personal income tax collections that underperformed their long-term trend.

Pew’s analysis is based on data that is revised each quarter by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Urban Institute. Revisions may affect several quarters of data. Consequently, states’ individual results may change based on updated data.

The values for Ohio’s corporate income tax over the 15-year period ending in the fourth quarter of 2023 predominantly include revenue from the state’s corporation franchise tax, which was fully phased out in 2016, and relatively small collections from the state’s pass-through entity and trust withholding tax, which was also phased out in 2016 but still applies to equity investors who are themselves pass-through entities.

In 2019, Oregon enacted a corporate activity tax on gross business receipts. As of late 2023, the U.S. Census Bureau reports this revenue under general sales and gross receipts. Pew excluded this revenue from Oregon’s sales tax figures for comparability with other states but did include it in the state’s total tax collections.

The recessions depicted in Figure 1 spanned from January 2008 to June 2009 and from March to April 2020. Because each data point represents the end—not the beginning—of the quarter, the shading for recessions appears at the left of each data point to show when during each quarter the U.S. economy was in recession. For more details on recession timing, see the business cycle dating from the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Sources & Methodology

Pew’s analysis is based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Quarterly Summary of State and Local Government Tax Revenue (QTAX) and data provided under license by the Urban Institute on July 24, 2024, which includes adjustments and corrections made to the U.S. Census Bureau’s QTAX dataset. Data is adjusted for inflation using the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis’ gross domestic product (GDP) implicit price deflator, accessed July 25, 2024.

For each state and quarter, Pew adjusted all revenue figures for inflation using the GDP implicit price deflator and calculated the trailing four-quarter moving average to smooth seasonal fluctuations. Because of these adjustments, peak and low quarters in this data may not align with high and low points in some states’ tax collections in actual dollars.

Next, Pew calculated the 15-year linear trend leading up to each quarter, based on the previous 60 quarters’ worth of inflation-adjusted, four-quarter moving averages.

Finally, Pew calculated for each state and quarter the percentage difference between the inflation-adjusted, four-quarter moving average of state tax revenue and the 15-year linear trend of tax collections ending in the same quarter.

In rare cases, the long-term trend values used for calculating the percentage difference from actual, inflation-adjusted revenue are negative, which, if left unaddressed, produce misleading negative percentage differences, even when actual revenue exceeds the negative long-term trend values. Of approximately 12,000 total data points, this occurred in 37 values, all in corporate income tax revenue in Alaska and Ohio. Pew addressed the issue by dividing the difference between actual revenue and its trend level by the absolute value of the trend level to ensure that the correct sign and direction of change were maintained.

The 50-state figure reflects the total amount of state tax revenue and so is an aggregate—rather than an average—for the states collectively.

Total tax revenue reflects taxes and licensing and compulsory fees collected by states. The Census Bureau defines taxes as “all compulsory contributions exacted by a government for public purposes, except employer and employee assessments for retirement and social insurance purposes.” The Census data also excludes unemployment compensation taxes. State governments report data for more than 25 types of taxes, including personal income, sales, corporate income, motor fuel sales, motor vehicle license, and severance. For more details on the definition of tax revenue, see the methodology from the Census Bureau.